To get you started, at the end of each Standard, there’s an example SMART goal.
Full list of standards and evidence-based tools that can be used (PDF file, 481 KB).
Example case study - Led by Dr Sophie Brandon, GP
Starting the Daffodil Standards - Levels 1 and 2
Our practice context
- Inner city, training practice (3 sites) in one of the most deprived and diverse boroughs in the UK
- List size almost 16K, grown 1200 in last 1 year
- Nursing home residents
Why our practice started the Daffodil Standards
- Gave us a step-by-step guide towards delivering excellent EOL care
- Already putting a lot of work into quality of EOL care, particularly at the nursing home, but wanted assurance all people received the same level of care
- Varying confidence and experience among our GPs
- Local commissioner offered support
Our QI journey
We took the plunge and signed up online to the Daffodil Standards - we got our practice welcome pack quickly in the post!
Level 1
- We appointed a GP lead across each of 3 sites.
- Met with all staff to introduce the Daffodil standards and agreed to work towards them
- Agreed with all staff on the planned audit which would inform us about which areas we needed to prioritise
- Got excited and decided to audit all deaths (77) rather than 20 deaths to collect our baseline data (Time taken 2 sessions)
Level 2
Method: EMIS Web search of relevant codes followed by manual search for missing data by Practice Manager
Results:
- Total number of deaths reviewed = 77
- Average age = 78.3 years
- 50/50 Male /Female ratio
- 65/77 had their ethnic status recorded. Of these 65, 12 (18%) were white British coded
- Main diagnoses: 31% (24/77) Non-BCC cancer, 45% (35/77) dementia or likely dementia. Cause of death often not recorded.
- 58% Nursing Home residents
- 3 sudden deaths - the rest we thought there were opportunities to plan EOLC but only 35% were on the practice palliative care register.
- Only 47% had a carer recorded (Daffodil Standard 3 - evidence 60-90% of people in the last year of life will have an informal carer)
- None had a carer’s support needs assessment (offered/sign-posted/completed)
- None were documented to have been sent condolences or offered bereavement support
Interestingly, in the nursing home 88% of residents had an electronic, shared EOLC plan and only 18% of people living independently had been recorded to have a plan. In both settings, of the people who had no recorded EOLC plan, significantly more people died in hospital
Sharing and using baseline data
We ran series of meetings across all staff groups where we
- Reminded about Daffodil Standards
- Shared baseline data – the variance in early identification and EOL planning – and lack of carer support
- Set targets to meet the evidence-based standards
- Agreed interventions to meet the targets
- Same info circulated to all staff by email
We prioritised where we needed to make improvements across the Daffodil Standards. From the baseline data we decided to focus on:
Standard 1: Professional and Competent Staff
Plan: Whole practice training programme
Measure: Training attendance, survey to staff on learning needs
Standard 2: Early Identification
Plan: Whole practice awareness, GP lists
Measure: Palliative care register & Electronic EOLC plans - numbers
Standard 3: Carer support – before and after
Plan: CSNAT tool, Primary care navigator
Measure: Use of CSNAT tool & Bereavement letter
What did we achieve with the Daffodil Standards in 3 months?
- Shared practice vision of improved EOLC, what that could look like and how to get there.
- 35% to 64% of people who died had been identified on the palliative care register for anticipatory supportive care planning
- 0% to 64% of people with a recorded NOK had condolences and bereavement info sent.
- For people living in their own residence we increased the number of people with an electronic EOLC plan from 18% to 50%
Full breakdown by standard
Standard 1: Professional and competent clinical and non-clinical staff required to provide high quality, safe and compassionate care in Advanced Serious Illness and EOLC
The General Practice commits to: |
To meet this standard the practice commits to: |
Self-Assessment |
Practice Guidance |
---|---|---|---|
1.1 Ensure that each individual staff member (clinical and non-clinical) understand their role and responsibility for Advanced Serious Illness and EOLC |
1.1a Ensure individuals can demonstrate an understanding of which skills relate to their role and consider staff training requirements to support Advanced Serious Illness and EOLC core standards |
|
Agree realistic practice SMART objectives (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Realistic and Timely); for reviewing training needs of staff Discuss and agree as a practice the key skills anticipated necessary for different staff roles. Example reflection frameworks:
Reflect on how previous experiences, attitudes, beliefs and personal barriers may affect the way staff work – cover issues affecting each standard e.g. non-identification of patients and carers, shared decision-making, communication etc. Consider staff understanding of how to handle:
Reflect with staff to make sure they have achieved or have a plan in place to achieve training on standards, which relate to their role. This may be done together during a practice meeting with reflection on cases or as part of an appraisal. |
1.1b Individuals have completed training on the standards that relate to their role |
|
Demonstrate practice support to clinical and non-clinical staff to achieve relevant agreed learning needs. Demonstrate reflection and learning about training, learning events, case studies etc. and show resulting impact or changes made in practice. |
|
1.1c Demonstrate the application and impact of using the standards
|
Examples include:
|
Practices should consider what type of reflection works for staff. Emphasis should be on rich discussion, reflection and steps needed to make continuous improvement – not unnecessary paperwork. If changes are being made, then agree how you will know that an improvement is made. Who’s involved, SMART goal, what to monitor in real-time practice and regular review process.
|
|
1.1d Demonstrate assessment, induction training on standards, appropriate to role, for all new staff. |
|
Examples include, as a regular discussion point discussion about patients who have died during a practice/ palliative care meeting; liaising with local hospice to enable visit to hospice as part of induction. Process may vary to be relevant to the staff member. |
|
1.2 Ensure all staff understand the feelings and communication needs of people approaching the end of life and their families/carers |
1.2a Improve the understanding and sensitive communication of individual staff and the team collectively, around dying, death and bereavement. |
|
|
1.3 Have practice clinical and non-clinical leads for Palliative & EOLC |
1.3a Appoint clinical and non-clinical leads with relevant leadership, skills, knowledge and understanding to do this role |
|
|
1.3b Lead(s) responsible for coordinating implementation of the standards | An action plan/Gantt chart for implementing quality improvement activity via the standards |
Lead to consider:
|
QI 1: Continuous Improvement
Example SMART Goal: Yearly SWOT (Strengths / Weaknesses / Opportunities /Threats) analysis of the practice’s ability to provide high quality, safe and compassionate care for people affected by Advanced Serious Illness, EOLC and bereavement.
Standard 2: There is early identification and recording that a person, has an Advanced Serious Illness, or EOLC needs.
The General Practice commits to: |
To meet this Standard the practice commits to: |
Self-Assessment |
Practice Guidance |
---|---|---|---|
2.1 Early identification of patients
|
2.1a Understand how to identify people who have an Advanced Serious Illness, or EOLC needs |
|
|
2.2 Practice Advanced Serious Illness and EOLC register |
2.2a Have a robust system in place to record and review patients requiring EOLC |
|
|
2.2b Have a robust system in place to record and review patients requiring EOLC |
|
|
QI 2: Continuous Improvement
Monthly recording of percentage of patients on practice list that is on Palliative Care/ Supportive Care Register. Displayed on a line graph, considering a number (or %) that is aligned with their population. Defined practice population (or %) = number of deaths in the last 12 months / total practice population
Example SMART goal: Within 6 months, increase from 20% to 60% of people with palliative care needs, who die to have been on supportive/ palliative care register.
Evidence base: 60-70% of people have an expected death and planning can support their needs with early identification of their needs.
Notes: Enhancing good practice and reducing variation in care. As your practice works towards consistently identifying your practice-relevant % of people who have an expected death, the next step could be to consider:
-
‘Deep dive’ learning from expected deaths: e.g. what care and support does ‘identification’ trigger in your practice? e.g. Carer identification, What Matters Most conversations and care planning. How is this coded consistently? Is there variation in equity between who receives this care, for example by age, diagnosis, disability or ethnicity?
-
Learning from unexpected deaths.
Audit template (XLS file, 305 KB) can be used to consider variation in equity of care and different aspects of care and support triggered following identification.
Standard 3: Carer Support – before and after death.
The General Practice commits to: |
To meet this standard the practice commits to: |
Self-Assessment |
Practice Guidance |
---|---|---|---|
3.1 Early identification of carers
|
3.1a Achieve consistent identification of carers |
|
|
3.2 Identification of carers' needs
|
3.2a Enable (conduct/sign-post to) holistic carer assessments |
|
Many HCPs report being fearful of opening up 'a can of worms' by asking carers what support they feel they need, but evidence shows that it is often quite simple things that make a difference and even just being asked is in itself supportive.
|
3.2b Support carers both as ‘clients’ and ‘co-workers’ |
|
Acknowledge carers are a resource in patient care.
|
|
3.1c Develop inter-practice communication |
|
|
QI 3: Continuous Improvement
Monthly recording of percentage of carers identified for patients on Palliative Care/ Supportive Care Register. Displayed on a line graph with an increasing objective to reach around 60-90% of Supportive Care Register patients, or a % that is aligned with their population.
Evidence base: 60-90% of people in the last year of life are likely to have an informal carer e.g. spouse / partner, sibling, son / daughter, neighbour / friend.
Example SMART goals: Within 6 months,
- Increase from 40% to 60% informal care-giver identification for people on Palliative Care/ Supportive Care Register
Notes: Enhancing good practice and reducing variation in care. As your practice works towards consistently identifying your practice-relevant % informal care-givers, you can also consider how the practice enables carers to have their needs assessed and the care and support carers are offered. - Increase from 0% to 30% assessment of informal care-giver needs e.g. CSNAT.org
- Increase 0% to 15% sign-posting/ referral to support, as per care-givers need(s)
Standard 4: Seamless, well-planned, coordinated care.
The General Practice commits to: |
To meet this standard the practice commits to: |
Self-Assessment |
Practice Guidance |
---|---|---|---|
4.1 Multi-disciplinary team meetings
|
4.1a Understand the role and optimum outcomes of the MDT meeting in Advanced Serious Illness and EOLC |
|
|
4.1b Hold regular Advanced Serious Illness, and EOLC MDT meetings |
|
Not all patients and carers on the register can be reviewed at each meeting, but a mechanism needs to ensure those of highest priority are discussed but that no one is ignored over a significant period. | |
4.1c Have input from interface teams, for example, hospice, community nursing, social prescribing etc. |
Minutes/notes of MDT meetings showing:
|
|
|
4.2 Coordination of care across all care settings |
4.2a Communicate across care settings |
|
|
4.3 Data Collection |
4.3a Achieve consistent data collection |
|
|
4.4 Data Sharing
|
4.4a Have a system for data sharing |
|
|
4.5 Monitor the quality of care provided to people who died over the year |
4.5a In practice consistent MDT template and annual retrospective death review |
Embed use (part of LEVEL 1) of: 1. MDT template (XSL file, 307 KB) to prospectively collect and monitor relevant information for people on palliative/ supportive care register AND 2. Annual retrospective audit (XLS file, 305 KB) – use relevant criteria from MDT template to audit deaths, for example last 20 deaths (all causes, on and off palliative/ supportive care register)
|
|
4.6 Specialist Palliative Care (SPC) – acute, community and hospice teams |
4.6a Have access to SPC / hospice team(s) |
|
|
QI 4: Continuous Improvement
Incorporate the use of MDT Template to support better and consistent decision-making and discussions at MDTs for patients and carers. This is a key part of achieving Level 1 of the Daffodil Standards.
Use the MDT template (XLS file, 307 KB) to monitor or retrospective audit template (XLS file, 305 KB) to consider all deaths and any learning (for people identified on the Palliative Care/ Supportive Care Register and people who died but were not identified).
If reflected on regularly at each MDT (e.g. monthly), this naturally helps the practice a) plan care and support for those identified and b) learn from deaths. In addition, the template forms the basis of a regular (e.g. annually) practice Retrospective Death Audit (to cover an agreed time) and action taken where outcomes achieved do not meet the practice accepted standards.
Evidence base: builds on National Information Standard for minimum EOLC dataset.
Example SMART goals: Within 3 months, review current and agree future consistent EOLC codes, aligned to MDT template column headings, to be recommended for use by all staff. This forms your monitoring dataset, across key Daffodil Standards. Monitor use and repeat review following 6 months of use.
Standard 5: Care is based on the assessed unique needs of the patient, carer and family.
The General Practice commits to: |
To meet this standard the practice commits to: |
Self-Assessment |
Practice Guidance |
---|---|---|---|
5.1 Implement Personalised Care and Support Planning (PCSP)
|
5.1a Understand the role and optimum outcomes of Personalised Care and Support Planning (PCSP)/Anticipatory Care Planning (ACP) |
|
Consider What Matters Most Conversations to base conversations, planning and recording with patients and families:
Consider evidencing peer discussion to agree objectives of PCSP/ACP:
Recognise the relevant legal framework in relation to:
|
|
5.1b Achieve consistent PCSP / ACP process for patients |
|
NHS England Personalised Care & Support Planning Handbook - Core Information NHS Wales Advance & Future Care Planning resource site Healthcare Improvement Scotland’s ACP Toolkit Considering using common assessment tools to identify and assess needs. For example, Sample letters designed by one practice can be used in the process:
|
5.1c Achieve consistent quality of PCSP/ACP, including DNACPR |
The recorded plan, including EOLC dataset, once started is completed and regularly reviewed and updated, in a timely manner and includes:
|
|
|
|
5.1d Achieve person-centred care |
|
|
QI 5: Continuous Improvement
The practice has identified areas for improvement from their process map (see 5.1b). They then use the 3 questions from the Model for Improvement, which are:
- What are we trying to accomplish?
- How will we know if a change has made an improvement?
- What changes can we make that will result in an improvement?
One of these changes at a time are taken into a Plan-Do-Study-Act cycle. Guidance on Model for Improvement and PDSA cycles can be found in the Quality Improvement area.
Example SMART goals:
- In month 1, identify areas for improvement in PSCP / ACP from practice process map.
- Retrospective audit (XLS file, 305 KB) of people who have a CPR/ DNACPR status recorded and quality of decision-making. Noting best practice guidance DNACPR status is not recorded in isolation but as part of wider PCSP/ ACP process and it is unacceptable for advance care plans, with or without DNAR form completion to be applied to groups of people of any description. These decisions must continue to be made on an individual basis according to need. See RCGP joint statement on advance care planning.
- Over 6 months, increase from 20% to 50% (% relevant to the practice) of people on Palliative /Supportive Care register to be offered ‘What Matters Most’ and ‘Goals of Care’ conversations with resulting PCSP/ ACP created and recorded with the patient and family at the centre.
Standard 6: Quality care during the last days of life.
The General Practice commits to: |
To meet this standard the practice commits to: |
Self-Assessment |
Practice Guidance |
---|---|---|---|
6.1 Provide care in the Last Days of Life, that aligns with the Five Priorities for Care: |
|
A practice policy agreement on caring for patients and those important to them in the last days of life, to recognise the objectives from the Five Priorities of Care above, to include:
|
|
|
6.1b Implement the five priorities of care (or equivalent in Wales) |
|
|
6.2 Provide treatment appropriate to the needs of the patient in the last days of life
|
6.2a Be able to prescribe and have readily available medications to control symptoms and for anticipatory prescribing in the last days of life |
|
|
|
6.2b Be able to access someone to set up and use a syringe driver. |
|
|
6.3 Monitor the quality of care per death provided to include the whole EOL period |
6.3a In practice mortality review for all patients using Daffodil Standards and QOF Retrospective Death Audit (XLS file, 305 KB). |
|
|
QI 6: Continuous Improvement
Audit implementation of 5 priorities of care across all deaths and action taken where outcomes achieved do not meet the practice accepted standards. Continuous monitoring of these criteria e.g. pain and symptoms assessed regularly in last days of life. For example, consider if the practice has a reliable system in place to assess with the patient and those important to them the 5 priorities of care AND document that the 5 priorities of care have been met, where possible.
Example SMART goal: Over 12 months, increase from 10% to 50% of people who died on palliative/ supportive care register, to have had documented the 5 key principles of Priorities for Care of the Dying (England) - ‘CRISP’ – Communicate, Recognise, Involve, Support, Plan & Do / Care Decisions for the Last Days of Life (Wales)
Standard 7: Care after death and Bereavement Support.
The General Practice commits to: |
To meet this standard the practice commits to: |
Self-Assessment |
Practice Guidance |
---|---|---|---|
7.1 Have understanding and be able to manage grief and bereavement
|
7.1a Understand the process of anticipatory grief and bereavement |
|
|
|
7.1b Understand how all staff can support bereaved people |
|
|
7.2 Knowledge of local systems
|
7.2a Ensure the bereaved are aware of how the practice can support and also local support available |
Practice support information available:
|
|
QI 7: Continuous Improvement
Regular audit (XLS file, 305 KB) of support offered to the bereaved, for example, documented contact with the bereaved, support information given.
Example SMART goal
- In month 1, agree process for increasing identification and coding of bereaved people known to the practice – to cover all deaths, including expected, unexpected/sudden, all ages, all causes including miscarriage and SIDS.
- Over 12 months, increase from 10% to 60% of family members / informal care-givers/ next-of-kin identified on the practice ‘supportive care register’ to be contacted and offered condolences/ sign-posted to information on dealing with grief and bereavement within 1 month (practice to decide) of the person on the register dying. (Note these will only cover expected deaths)
A range of bereavement resources aimed to help general practice provide information and signposting to bereaved patients and families.
Standard 8: General Practice being hubs within Compassionate Communities.
The General Practice commits to: |
To meet this standard the practice commits to: |
Self-Assessment |
Practice Guidance |
---|---|---|---|
8.1 Support the development of compassionate communities |
8.1a Develop the practice itself as a compassionate community |
|
|
8.1b Learn lessons from patients and their carers |
System is in place to actively debrief staff and wider team on deaths, particularly where death is unexpected or goes wrong:
|
|
|
8.1c Utilise wider community resources |
|
|
QI 8: Continuous Improvement
In order that lessons can be learned from the experience of advanced serious illness, EOLC, caring responsibilities, death and bereavement. Lessons can be shared with the relevant people.
Example SMART goal: Over 12 months, assess whether practice staff / patients / carers feed back the practice is meeting the end of life care needs, and show how any information provided is used to help improve care and support by achieving a minimum of:
- 2-5 family/care-giver or patient interviews e.g. semi-structured discussion, using an agreed template or annual carer survey relevant to EOLC needs.
- Staff feedback to support the QI planning e.g. survey, debriefs, SEAs
- MDT feedback to support the QI planning e.g. survey, discussion at MDT
- Annual evaluation of compassionate organisational culture
Thank you for your feedback. Your response will help improve this page.